Epi 12 The Good Life

Debating same-sex marriage

Two way of defining justice

  1. Justice relativist
  2. Justice is bound up with the good in a relativist

::Reasoning about the purpose and ends of the good is the necessary::
::feature of arguing about the justice::

The Good Life

Is it necessary or unavoidable to take up the good life to think about the justice?

Yes

moral reasoning
John Rawls: reflective equilibrium
Pluralist society

If we are going to think of our disagreements about morality and religion has bound up with our disagreements about justice, how are we ever going to find a way to our society that accords respect to fellow citizens we disagree?

It depends which conception of respect one accepts


#Note

Your browser is out-of-date!

Update your browser to view this website correctly. Update my browser now

×