Two way of defining justice
- Justice relativist
- Justice is bound up with the good in a relativist
::Reasoning about the purpose and ends of the good is the necessary::
::feature of arguing about the justice::
Is it necessary or unavoidable to take up the good life to think about the justice?
John Rawls: reflective equilibrium
If we are going to think of our disagreements about morality and religion has bound up with our disagreements about justice, how are we ever going to find a way to our society that accords respect to fellow citizens we disagree?
It depends which conception of respect one accepts